摘要：回顧爭端裁決（DAB）出現前單一的爭端解決機制，DRB對DAB的影響，以及DAB對爭端解決的貢獻及不足。在此基礎上，通過對FIDIC（2017）索賠和DAAB條款的分析，以及該條款在糾紛預防、索賠程序、索賠證據與時效等方面的論證，認為FIDIC的最新發展進一步強調了DAAB爭端解決機制的重要性，明確了預防爭端發生的環節，在爭端解決處理上融入證據與時效理念，使FIDIC爭端解決機制更加完善。

關鍵詞：菲迪克（2017）；爭端裁決；機制；完善

Abstract：This paper reviews the single dispute settlement mechanism before the emergence of DAB，the influence of DRB on DAB，and the contribution and deficiency of DAB to dispute settlement. Thereof，based on the FIDIC（2017）claims and the DAAB clause analysis，and discussions on such prevention，claim procedures and terms in the dispute，claim evidence and limitation of reasoning，it is believed that the latest development of FIDIC further emphasizes the importance of the DAAB dispute settlement mechanism，clarifies the link of preventing disputes，and further integrates the concept of legal evidence and limitation in dispute settlement，makes FIDIC more perfect in dispute settlement.

Keywords：FIDIC（2017）；dispute adjudication；mechanism；improvement

參考文獻

[1] 陳勇強，呂文學，張水波.FIDIC2017版系列合同條件解析[M].北京：中國建筑工業出版社，2019.

[2] 李德智.FIDIC合同條款概論（雙語）[M].北京：中國建筑工業出版社，2017.

[3] John Adriaanse. Constrcution Contract Law[M]. 4th Edition，Macmillan Education Palgrave，2016.

[4] Robert Kmutson. FIDIC An Analysis of International Construction Contracts[M]. Kluwer Law，2005.

建筑經濟，2020（5）：15-18